pale blue dot -carl sagan-第44章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
derground garden。 Implementation would require a significant step beyond what we have today； but—unlike 〃paragravity〃—nothing in such a scheme seems impossible。 All the elements can be found in contemporary technology。 If there were sufficient reason； a fair number of us could be living on （or in asteroids by the twenty…second century。
They would of course need a source of power； not just to sustain themselves； but； as Bernal suggested； to move their asteroidal homes around。 （It does not seem so big a step from explosive alteration of asteroid orbits to a more gentle means of propulsion a century or two later。） If an oxygen atmosphere were generated from chemically bound water； then organics could be burned to generate power； just as fossil fuels are burned on the Earth today。 Solar power could be considered； although for the main…belt asteroids the intensity of sunlight is only about 10 percent what it is on Earth。 Still； we could imagine vast fields of solar panels covering the surfaces of inhabited asteroids and converting sunlight into electricity。 Photovoltaic technology is routinely used in Earth…orbiting spacecraft； and is in increasing use on the surface of the Earth today。 But while that might be enough to warm and light the homes of these descendants； it does not seem adequate to change asteroid orbits。
For that； Williamson proposed using anti…matter。 Antimatter is just like ordinary matter； with one significant difference。 Consider hydrogen： An ordinary hydrogen atom consists of a positively charged proton on the inside and a negatively charged electron on the outside。 An atom of anti…hydrogen consists of a negatively charged proton on the inside and a positively charged electron （also called a positron） on the outside。 The protons； whatever the sign of their charges； have the same mass； and the electrons； whatever the sign of their charges； have the same mass。 Particles with opposite charges attract。 A hydrogen atom and an anti…hydrogen atom are both stable； because in both cases the positive and negative electrical charges precisely balance。
Anti…matter is not some hypothetical construct from the perfervid musings of science fiction writers or theoretical physicists。 Anti…matter exists。 Physicists make it in nuclear accelerators； it can be found in high…energy cosmic rays。 So why don't we hear more about it？ Why has no one held up a lump of antimatter for our inspection？ Because matter and anti…matter； when brought into contact； violently annihilate each other； disappearing in an intense burst of gamma rays。 We cannot tell whether something is made of matter or anti…matter just by looking at it。 The spectroscopic properties of； for example； hydrogen and anti…hydrogen are identical。
Albert Einstein's answer to the question of why we see only matter and not anti…matter was； 〃Matter won〃—by which he meant that in our sector of the Universe at least； after almost all the matter and anti…matter interacted and annihilated each other long ago； there was some of what we call ordinary matter left over。* As far as we can tell today； from gamma ray astronomy and other means； the Universe is made almost entirely of matter。 The reason for this engages the deepest cosmological issues； which need not detain us here。 But if there was only a one…particle…in…a…billion difference in the preponderance of matter over anti…matter at the beginning； even this would be enough to explain the Universe we see today。
* If it had been the other way； then we and everything else in this part of the Universe would be made of anti…matter。 We would； of course； call it matter—and the idea of worlds and life made of that other kind of material。 the stuff with the electrical charges reversed； we'd consider wildly speculative。
Williamson imagined that humans in the twenty…second century would move asteroids around by the controlled mutual annihilation of matter and anti…matter。 All the resulting gamma rays； if collimated； would make a potent rocket exhaust。 The anti…matter would be available in the main asteroid belt （between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter）； because this was his explanation for the existence of the asteroid belt。 In the remote past； he proposed； an intruder anti…matter worldlet arrived in the Solar System from the depths of space； impacted； and annihilated what was then an Earthlike planet； fifth from the Sun。 The fragments of this mighty collision are the asteroids； and some of them are still made of anti…matter。 Harness an anti…asteroid—Williamson recognized that this might be tricky—and you can move worlds around at will。
At the time； Williamson's ideas were futuristic； but far from foolish。 Some of 〃Collision Orbit〃 can be considered visionary。 Today； however； we have good reason to believe that there are no significant amounts of anti…matter in the Solar System； and that the asteroid belt； far from being a fragmented terrestrial planet； is an enormous array of small bodies prevented （by the gravitational tides of Jupiter） from forming an Earthlike world。
However； we do generate （very） small amounts of antimatter in nuclear accelerators today； and we will probably be able to manufacture much larger amounts by the twenty…second century。 Because it is so efficient—converting all of the matter into energy； E = MC2； with 100 percent efficiency—perhaps anti…matter engines will be a practical technology by then； vindicating Williamson Failing that； what energy sources can we realistically expect to be available； to reconfigure asteroids； to light them warm them； and move them around？
The Sun shines by jamming protons together and turning them into helium nuclei。 Energy is released in the process； although with less than 1 percent the efficiency of the annihilation of matter and anti…matter。 But even proton…proton reactions are far beyond anything we can realistically imagine for ourselves in the near future。 The required temperatures are much too high。 Instead） of jamming protons together； though； we might use heavier kinds of hydrogen。 We already do so in thermonuclear weapons。 Deuterium is a proton bound by nuclear forces to a neutron； tritium is a proton bound by nuclear forces to two neutrons。 It seems likely that in another century we will have practical power schemes that involve the controlled fusion of deuterium and tritium； and of deuterium and helium。 Deuterium and tritium are present as minor constituents in water （on Earth and other worlds）。 The kind of helium needed for fusion； 3He （two protons and a neutron make up its nucleus）； has been implanted over billions of years by the solar wind in the surfaces of the asteroids。 These processes are not nearly as efficient as the proton…proton reactions in the Sun； but they could provide enough power to run a small city for a year from a lode of ice only a few meters in size。
Fusion reactors seem to be ing along too slowly to play a major role in solving； or even significantly mitigating； global warming。 But by the twenty…second century； they ought to be widely available。 With fusion rocket engines； it will be possible to more asteroids and ets around the inner Solar System taking a main…belt asteroid； for example； and inserting it into orbit around the Earth。 A world 10 kilometers across could be transported from Saturn； say； to Mars through nuclear burning of the hydrogen in an icy et a kilometer across。 （Again； I'm assuming a time of much greater political stability and safety。）
PUT ASIDE FOR THE MOMENT any qualms you might have about the ethics of rearranging worlds； or our ability to do so without catastrophic consequences。 Digging out the insides of worldlets； reconfiguring them for human habitation； and moving them from one place in the Solar System to another seems to be within our grasp in another century or two。 Perhaps by then we will have adequate international safeguards as well。 But what about transforming the surface environments not of asteroids or ets； but of planets？ Could we live on Mars？
If we wanted to set up housekeeping on Mars； it's easy to see that； in principle at least； we could do it： There's abundant sunlight。 There's plentiful water in the rocks and in underground and polar ice。 The atmosphere is mostly carbon dioxide。 It seems likely that in self…contained habitats…perhaps domed enclosures—we could grow crops； manufacture oxygen from water； recycle wastes。
At first we'd be dependent on modities resupplied from Earth； but in time we'd manufacture more and more of them ourselves。 We'd bee increasingly self…sufficient。 The domed enclosures； even if made of ordinary glass； would let in the visible sunlight and screen out the Sun's ultraviolet rays。 With oxygen masks and protective garments—but nothing as bulky and cumbersome as a spacesuit—we could leave these enclosures to go exploring； or to build another domed village and farms。
It seems very evocative of the American pioneering experience； but with at least one major difference： In the early stages； large subsidies are essential。 The technology required is too expensive for some poor family； like my grandparents a century ago； to pay their own passage to Mars。 The early Martian pioneers will be sent by governments and will have highly specialized skills。 But in a generation or two； when children and grandchildren are born there— and especially when self…sufficiency is within reach—that will begin to change。 Youngsters born on Mars will be given specialized training in the technology essential for survival in this new environment。 The settlers will bee less heroic and less exceptional。 The full range of human strengths and deficiencies will begin to assert themselves。 Gradually； precisely because of the difficulty of getting from Earth to Mars； a unique Martian culture will begin to emerge—distinct aspirations and fears tied to the environment they live in； distinct technologies； distinct social problems； distinct solutions—and； as has occurred in every similar circumstance throughout human history； a gradual sense of cultural and political estrangement from the mother world。
Great ships will arrive carrying essential technology from Earth； new families of settlers； scarce resources。 It is hard to know； on the basis of our limited knowledge of Mars； whether they will go home empty—or whether they will carry with them something found only on Mars； something considered very valuable on Earth。 Initially much of the scientific investigation of samples of the Martian surface will be done on Earth。 But in time the scientific study of Mars （and its moons Phobos and Deimos） will be done from Mars。
Eventually—as has happened with virtually every other form of human transportation—interplanetary travel will bee accessible to people of ordinary means： to scientists pursuing their own research projects； to settlers fed up with Earth； even to venturesome tourists。 And of course there will be explorers。
If the time ever came when it was possible to make the Martian environment much more Earth…like—so protective garments； oxygen masks； and domed farmlands and cities could be dispensed with—the attraction and accessibility of Mars would be increased many…fold。 The same； of course； would be true for any other world which could be engineered so that humans could live
